Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 071
Original file (2013 071.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-071

 

TIS - | 6 yrs, 6 months, 5 days
Policy Implications _| None

 

 

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs. The applicant tested positive for
marijuana on a random urinalysis in 2012. The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident.
Pursuant to policy, he was recommended for Discharge due to the drug incident.

The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant has no new evidence to absolve
his illegal drug use.

The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney.
The applicant declined those rights and did not object to discharge.

Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for
individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The separation is consistent with

the substance abuse policy; the Coast Guard has zero tolerance for drug abuse. The General, Under Honorable
Conditions discharge is equitable.

Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: An administrative change will be

made to the appropriate Separation Authority within the Military Separation Manual: COMDTINST M1000.4,
Art 1-B-17. All other items stand as issued.

Similar Decisions

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 004

    Original file (2014 004.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with drugs in 2011. The applicant admitted to the Coast Guard Investigative Service (CGIS) in the Fall of 2010 to using marijuana on different occasions. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 027

    Original file (2014 027.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant he was recommended for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 011

    Original file (2014 011.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 031

    Original file (2014 031.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 010

    Original file (2014 010.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 066

    Original file (2013 066.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRB DOCKET 2013-066 TIS 1 yrs, 3 months, 13 days | Policy Implications None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant was discharged for Misconduct due to Involvement with Drugs in 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The Coast Guard has zero tolerance for drug abuse, the character of service and separation issued is equitable.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 060

    Original file (2013 060.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant had a positive urinalysis result during a random testing in late 2012. The applicant’s had 10 years of service which afforded the right to an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) that occurred in the Spring of 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 046

    Original file (2013 046.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Per ALCOAST 605/10, the use of spice was specified as illegal for all Coast Guard members. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012

    Original file (2013 012.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.

  • CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 033

    Original file (2013 033.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.